Robert Jenrick accuses Rishi Sunak of going back on his promise regarding deportations.


Robert Jenrick has alleged that the prime minister has not fulfilled his promise to take necessary action to prevent the arrival of boats.

The previous minister in charge of immigration resigned from his position on Wednesday, shortly after Rishi Sunak introduced a bill to preserve his policy of deporting individuals to Rwanda.

Jenrick resigned following the disclosure that the law did not permit the government to supersede international laws preventing the deportation of asylum seekers to central Africa. Rwanda had threatened to withdraw from the agreement if the UK disregarded international law, and up to 10 ministers had hinted at potential resignation if the bill did not comply.

According to an article in the Daily Telegraph, the Member of Parliament representing Newark in Nottinghamshire stated that upon his appointment in October 2022, the Home Office was facing numerous challenges and the UK was overwhelmed due to the high volume of small boat crossings in the Channel.

He stated that the situation of hotels housing asylum seekers was made worse by the “unjustifiable” and “ridiculous” circumstances.

Jenrick stated: “The prime minister made the correct decision to commit to doing whatever is necessary to put an end to this ridiculous situation. And, up until Wednesday, he had followed through on his promise.”

According to him, Sunak was correct in stating that the new Rwanda bill goes above and beyond the previous legislation. However, he also mentioned that if it is approved, it will still not put an end to the constant cycle of legal disputes that hinder the swift removal of small boat arrivals in large enough numbers to serve as a significant deterrent.

Section 4 of the legislation permits individuals to file appeals against their personal expulsion to Rwanda. Jenrick stated: “There is a high likelihood of backlogs forming, resulting in extended delays for cases that would normally be resolved in a matter of months. Injunctions are also likely to be issued.”

This will result in us having to release individuals from detention due to failed bail claims, leading to the possibility of them fleeing and being unaccounted for in society.

This bill’s promise to quickly detain and remove all arriving individuals is highly unlikely.

“The bill that can accomplish this task is one that ensures prompt removal within days of arrival by eliminating individual challenges that could hinder the process.”

According to Jenrick, he holds the belief that incorporating individuals from various countries into British culture is not feasible given the current immigration rates.

Bypass the advertisement for the newsletter.

“It is not feasible for GP services and hospitals to magically appear,” he stated. “If over 1.2 million individuals are allowed into the system within two years, integration becomes unattainable.”

The bill on asylum and immigration in Rwanda did not fully withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights and does not contain any “notwithstanding clauses” that would enable government officials to bypass the ECHR and other international agreements.

The proposed law, subject to a vote in parliament, grants government officials the authority to ignore parts of the Human Rights Act.

On Thursday, during an urgent press conference at Downing Street, the prime minister stated that he is determined to push forward with his contentious deportation plan, despite backlash from conservative members and concern from moderate MPs.

Source: theguardian.com

You May Also Like

More From Author